Custody and Bankruptcy-Remote Structures, Explained
Where collateral sits, and who holds it, matters. It decides whether pledged shares stay safe if the lender hits financial trouble. Bankruptcy-remote custody is the institutional standard. It protects client assets for the whole life of the loan.
The core question: where do the shares sit
In any securities-backed loan, custody of the collateral is one of the biggest structural choices. The lender can hold the shares in its own accounts. An independent third-party custodian can hold them. Or they can sit, segregated, in a special-purpose vehicle. Each choice plays out differently if the lender becomes insolvent. Take shares held in the lender’s own accounts without segregation. In an insolvency, they may be open to the lender’s general creditors. The borrower can then lose out even though, on its side, the loan is fully secured. An independent custodian is different. It holds the collateral outside the lender’s estate. So insolvency proceedings against the lender should not stop the borrower getting the shares back on repayment.
What bankruptcy-remote means in practice
A bankruptcy-remote structure is built so that a defined pool of assets is legally ring-fenced. The ring-fence shields the pool from the insolvency risk of any party in the transaction chain. In custody, this typically means a regulated, independent custodian holds the pledged shares in a segregated account. The custody agreement expressly bars the custodian from using the assets to meet its own obligations, or the lender’s. The custodian’s mandate is purely administrative: hold, record, and transfer securities on authenticated instructions. If the lender fails, the custodian keeps holding the shares. It holds them for whoever is legally entitled to them under the facility agreement — the borrower on repayment, or an enforcement sale process.
Special-purpose vehicles and asset segregation
Some lenders use a special-purpose vehicle to hold collateral. The SPV is a separate legal entity with no other assets or liabilities. That makes it structurally bankruptcy-remote from the lender and every other group entity. The SPV owns nothing but the pledged securities. So even if the lender group runs into wider financial distress, the SPV’s assets stay out of reach of the group’s creditors. The approach is common in structured finance. It is used more and more in securities-backed lending for larger facilities. It adds legal and administrative complexity. But it gives a high degree of asset protection. Some positions are large or strategically important. Borrowers holding them should ask whether an SPV custody structure fits their transaction.
Why the governing law matters
How well a bankruptcy-remote structure works turns on two things. One is the legal jurisdiction that governs the custody arrangement. The other is whether the agreements can be enforced under the insolvency law that applies. Jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg, and Delaware have well-developed statutes. These support asset segregation and ring-fencing. Elsewhere, the position may be less certain. Borrowers should take independent legal advice on the proposed custody set-up. Does it give the protection it claims to offer? The advice should test that under the law of the jurisdiction most likely to govern any insolvency proceedings. Black Haven works with counsel experienced in cross-border custody and insolvency law. The aim is facilities that give clients robust protection.
Questions to ask before signing
Before accepting a lending proposal, borrowers should ask four key questions about custody. First, where will the shares be held, and by whom? Second, is the custodian independent of the lender? Third, is the account segregated, so the custodian cannot use the shares for its own ends? Fourth, what happens to the shares if the lender fails? And is that position confirmed by legal opinion in the relevant jurisdiction? A lender that cannot answer these questions well should give a sophisticated borrower pause. So should one that will not discuss them. Openness about custody arrangements is the mark of an institution that takes client asset protection seriously.
Frequently asked.
01What is a bankruptcy-remote custody structure?
02Does Black Haven use independent custodians?
03Should I seek my own legal advice on custody arrangements?
Keep reading.
Dividends, Corporate Actions and Your Pledge
Understanding how dividends and corporate events interact with a pledged share position protects your economics throughout the loan.
Read → Recourse · May 18, 2020Why Non-Recourse Matters in a Sell-Off
The distinction between recourse and non-recourse lending becomes starkly clear when markets fall sharply — and it can mean the difference between a managed outcome and a financial crisis.
Read →A position to talk through?
Send a confidential enquiry, and a senior principal will reply within one business day.