Drawing Liquidity in a Market Drawdown
A sustained market drawdown is one of the most challenging environments a major shareholder can face. Asset values fall, credit conditions tighten, and the usual routes to liquidity — asset sales, equity issuance, or conventional bank credit — become expensive, slow, or entirely unavailable. Understanding which financing tools remain functional in these conditions is essential preparation.
Why conventional credit tightens in a drawdown
When equity markets fall sharply, the institutions that provide most conventional credit become simultaneously more cautious and more constrained. Banks face pressure on their own balance sheets as loan-book values deteriorate, regulatory capital buffers come under scrutiny, and risk appetite recedes across the organisation. Credit committees tighten eligibility criteria, widen spreads, reduce maximum advances, and lengthen approval timelines. For borrowers who are not existing clients with established facilities already in place, obtaining new credit in a sharp downturn can take weeks or months — far too slow to be useful if the need is immediate. The paradox is acute: the moment when liquidity is most needed is also the moment when it is hardest to obtain through conventional channels.
Securities-backed lending in a falling market
Securities-backed lending against listed shares does not disappear in a drawdown, but its terms naturally adjust to reflect higher uncertainty. Lenders who were willing to advance sixty-five per cent of market value against a specific position in stable conditions may reduce that to fifty-five per cent when volatility spikes and liquidity in the underlying shares contracts. For borrowers with facilities already in place — secured before the drawdown began — this matters less: the advance has already been received. For new borrowers approaching lenders in the midst of market stress, realistic expectations about achievable LTVs are important. Structuring a facility before a crisis, rather than in the middle of one, consistently produces better terms.
The value of pre-arranged facilities
One of the clearest lessons from periods of acute market stress is the value of having financing in place before it is needed. A shareholder who completes a term facility against their listed shares during a period of relative market calm has secured liquidity for the facility’s duration — typically one to three years — regardless of what happens to markets during that time. If the share price falls, the borrower has already received the loan proceeds and can deploy them. If conditions deteriorate severely, the borrower with a non-recourse facility knows their maximum loss is the pledged collateral, and their other assets are protected. Planning ahead transforms a potentially chaotic reactive decision into a considered strategic one.
Deploying drawdown liquidity effectively
Shareholders who access liquidity through securities-backed borrowing during or ahead of a drawdown face a secondary question: how to deploy those proceeds most effectively. Options range from defensive — holding cash or near-cash equivalents as a buffer against personal liabilities — to opportunistic, using the liquidity to acquire assets at distressed prices when markets have fallen. The right answer depends heavily on the individual’s financial position, risk appetite, and investment horizon. What is important is that the decision is made deliberately, with full understanding of the obligation to repay the loan at maturity, and with advice from appropriate financial and legal professionals. Black Haven provides the financing; deployment decisions rest with the borrower and their advisers.
Counterparty stability in a stressed environment
In periods of acute market stress, counterparty risk — the risk that the financing provider itself encounters difficulty — becomes a legitimate concern. Borrowers should consider not only the terms of the facility but also the stability and continuity of their lender. Black Haven Investments operates as a principal lender using its own balance sheet, without dependence on wholesale funding markets that can seize up in a crisis. Facilities are structured as bilateral agreements directly between Black Haven and the borrower, with clear, contractually defined terms that are not subject to unilateral revision based on market conditions during the term. That stability is a feature that borrowers should value at least as much as the headline LTV.
Frequently asked.
01Is it possible to arrange a securities-backed facility in the middle of a market downturn?
02What happens to an existing facility if market conditions deteriorate significantly after drawdown?
03How long does it typically take to arrange a facility with Black Haven?
Keep reading.
Concentrated Single-Stock Risk and the Case for Borrowing
Holding a large proportion of personal wealth in one company’s shares creates risks that are often underestimated — and securities-backed borrowing can help manage them.
Read → Risk · September 30, 2019Liquidity, Free Float and Borrowing Capacity
A share’s liquidity and free float are central to how much a lender will advance against it — and why some positions attract higher LTVs than others.
Read →A position to talk through?
Send a confidential enquiry, and a senior principal will reply within one business day.